1. How can a person show that a Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 is the
proper way to demostrate he is entitled relief when the lower
courts Deny a motion, without going to its merits, or how can a
petition get threw the 2255 saving clause, when everything is
inadequate or inefficient, and still the courts say that I did
not demostrate i can pass the saving clause issue, when I have
demostrated I can use the saving clause of the 2255 to challenge
validity of the sentence enhancement in my case. I have gone
through every issue to demostrate I am entitled for the savings
clause .

2. Having preserved the issue of the prior conviction in which I
was enhanced (Texas Prior Conviction for Delivery of Marijuana of
1989) at sentencing, direct appeal and 2255 long before Mathis v.
United States 136 S.ct.2243 and Descamps v. United States 133
S.ct. 2276 were ever ruled on, make this case an issue preserved
for this Honorable court to review for error?

How can a person show that a Writ of Habeas Corpus 2241 is the proper way to demonstrate he is entitled relief when the lower courts deny a motion, without going to its merits, or how can a petition get through the 2255 saving clause, when everything is inadequate or inefficient, and still the courts say that I did not demonstrate I can pass the saving clause issue, when I have demonstrated I can use the saving clause of the 2255 to challenge validity of the sentence enhancement in my case. I have gone through every issue to demonstrate I am entitled for the savings clause