Carlos Alberto Ochoa-Orozco v. United States
DueProcess
1. Whether the district court violated Appellant's right to due process, and his Sixth Amendment right to affair trial, where' the district court 'lacked' venue pursuant to Rule 18, Fed. R. Crim. P.
2. Whether pursuant to the Sixth Amendment, it is a violation of Appe 1 lant'is right to a fair trial, where the Assistant U.S. Attorney threatens the defendant, by assuring him that [i]f he takes the witness stand in his own defense, he'll make sure that he receives a life sentence.
3. Whether Appellant must be resentenced where the District Court, sentenced him in accordance with the charges contained in the indi ctment, but Appellant plead to a different charge, contained in the Plea Agreement.
4. Where there is an obvious Apprendi/Blakely error, must Appellant be resentenced.
5. Whether Appellant must be resentenced where counsel was so in effective at [both] the trial-level, and Appellate level, that his representation amounted to (no representation.)
6. Whether Appellant must be retried where the cumulative effect of "numerous ''' Constitutional errors; Procedural errors; Due Process errors rendered the proceedings inherently unfair.
7. Where the rulings of the District Court, and the Appellate Courts' are in conflict with this court((the SupremeCGourt) in relation to their holdings to this particular case ?
Whether the district court violated Appellant's right to due process and his Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial