WHETHER THE STATE OF FLORIDA VIOLATED PETITIONER'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, WHEN POLICE INSERTED A PAID INFORMANT IN PETITIONER'S JAIL CELL, FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF EXTRACTING INFORMATION THAT WOULD INCULPATE PETITIONER'S INVOLVEMENT IN UNSOLVED CRIMES THAT WERE UNDER INVESTIGATION?

WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DENYING MORRIS' PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, ON PROCEDURAL GROUNDS, WHERE THE ISSUES RAISED, WOULD WORK A MANIFEST INJUSTICE, BASED ON VIOLATION(S) OF THE FIFTH, SIXTH, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS, WHERE POLICE TACTICS, WHICH INCLUDED TRICKERY AND DECEPTION, WERE EMPLOYED TO COERCE PETITIONER INTO IMPLICATING HIMSELF IN CRIMES COMMITTED BY ANOTHER?

WHETHER PETITIONER'S PLEA WAS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OBTAINED, WHERE IT WAS INDUCED THROUGH PROMISE, TRICKERY, AND THREATS, IN THE ABSENCE OF THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, MAKING THE PLEA INVOLUNTARY AND VOID AB-INITIO?

Whether the state of Florida violated petitioner's sixth amendment right to the assistance of counsel