1)- WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH, AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS RIGHT'S SECURED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, AND DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW, BY THE AGENT'S FALSE FACT TESTIMONY, AND REPORT'S, THAT ARE ALSO IN VIOLATION OF DEA/POLICE POLICY, AND PROCEDURE?

2)- AFTER PETITIONER REFUSED TO GO MEET INFORMANT AT THE PRE-ARRANGED AMOCO FILLING STATION LOCATION ON JANUARY 3rd, 2001 -DID PETITIONER WITHDRAW FROM THE CHARGED OFFENSE OF CONSPIRACY WITH HIM?, AND DID THE AGENT'S THEREAFTER COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT'S WITH FABRICATED FACT'S?

3). WHEN DOES A COOPERATING DEFENDANT/INFORMANT COUNT AS A CO-CONSPIRATOR IN ANY CASE, OR STOP COUNTING AS A CO-CONSPIRATOR IN ANY CASE, AND WAS THERE BIAS, AND CONFLICT'S OF INTERESTS THAT PREVENTED PROPER ASSESSMENT'OF FACT'S?

4)- DID THE AGENT'S OMIT FACTS AND EVIDENCE, THEN LUMP-UP MULTIPLE CONSPIRACIES AS ONE-TO FALSELY CHARGE PETITIONER DJENASEVIC WITHOUT SPECIFIC PROOF OF CONSPIRACY, AND DID THE COURT FAIL TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE IN CONTRAVENTION OF RULE 201(d)?

Whether petitioner was denied his Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights