WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS DECISION TO DENY A COA CONCLUDING
THAT PETITIONER SUFFICEINCY OF EVIDENCE CLAIM WAS PROCEDURALLY
DEFAULTED BASED ON STATE COURT'S ERRONEOUS FACTS WAS CORRECT?

WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED HIS RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE CROSS-
EXAMINATION UNDER THE SIXTH AMENDMENT WHEN THE STATE FAILED TO
DISCLOSE THAT AN ARRESTING STATE TROOPER WAS BEING INVESTIGATED
FOR SEXUAL ACTS CONDUCTED ON A COMPUTER DURING PETITIONER'S
TRIAL, WHICH AFTER THE STATE TROOPERS ARREST TAMPERED EVIDENCE
FROM - PETITIONER 'S CASE WAS FOUND IN THE , STATE TROOPER 'S
RESIDENCE?

Whether the court of appeals decision to deny a COA concluding that petitioner sufficiency of evidence claim was procedurally defaulted based on state court's erroneous facts was correct?