Carlous Lindell Daily v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
(1). Whether The Lower Court(s) Erred In Concluding
That Petitioner Did Not Suffer Ineffective
Assistance Of Counsel At His Resentencing
On Appeal Of His Resentencing: And
(a) . In Light Of Shepard?; And
(b) . Whether A Sentence Which Exceeds The
Statutory Maximum, Is Harmless Error?
(2). Whether The Lower Court(s) Erred In Concluding
That Petitioner's Instant And Predicate
Offense(s) Qualify As A Crime Of Violence
For Purposes Of . U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2?
(3). Whether The Lower Court(s) Erred In Concluding That:
(a) . Even Applying Johnson To § 924(c) ,
Petitioner's Conviction would Still Stand.?;
(b) . The Language In 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (3) (B) ,
Similar To ACCA's Residual Clause, Is Not
Void For Vagueness In Light Of Johnson?
(4). Whether The Lower Court(s) Erred In Concluding That
Petitioner Failed To Make A Substantial Showing
Of The Denial Of A Constitutional Right?
Whether the lower court(s) erred in concluding that petitioner did not suffer ineffective assistance of counsel