No. 18-9765

Joseph Kinard v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2019-06-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bar-membership civil-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure discovery due-process evidence jurisdiction oath-of-office prosecutorial-misconduct state-court-review supreme-court-jurisdiction vagueness
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Doa Assistant United States Attomey have to be a member of The Barin that city or state to presecute youin United states District Courtand Superior Court.

Once the jory's fine younot guiltyofa firearmed in United States District Court. Can the Same Assistant United states Attomey use the same firearm in your Case in Superior Court.

Cana Assistant United Statos Attorey call governmentwitne and tell them not to talk to the defense team.

The tril Judge told the Assistant United States Attomey to turn over the Detective Kennedy's notes to the defense team. the government never turn them over.

The Supreme Court struck down possession of firearm being unconstitutionally vague in Superior Court.

If the state of Maryland dropa caseagainst someone. Car the District of Columbia use the evidenceto show intent.

Do a Assistant United States Attorney have to be under the Oath of Office before he orshe star work.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a United States Attorney must be a member of the bar in the city or state to prosecute cases in the United States District Court and Superior Court

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-02
Waiver of right of respondent to respond filed.
2019-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 24, 2019)

Attorneys

Joseph Kinard
Joseph Kinard — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent