1. Should a petition for writ of certiorari be granted to resolve a conflict between the Second and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeal on whether a defendant can be found to have waived his right to counsel, and proceed pro se, even if he declines to answer the district court's questions, because any other rule would force judges to ignore words, actions, and circumstances relevant to the Sixth Amendment Faretta inquiry?

Should a defendant be found to have waived his right to counsel and proceed pro se even if he declines to answer the district court's questions?