No. 18-9759
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cognitive-defects due-process fundamental-rights kennedy-v-mendoza-martinez punishment-analysis rational-basis rational-basis-review sex-offender-registration strict-scrutiny substantive-due-process unfit-defendant
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Does Illinois's SORA scheme constitute punishment that impinges the fundamental right of unfit defendants to be free from trial or sentencing, thus failing strict scrutiny?
II. Does Illinois's SORA scheme's application to unfit defendants unlikely to recidivate violate substantive due process, both facially under rational basis review and as applied to a defendant with significant cognitive defects?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does Illinois's SORA scheme constitute punishment that impinges the fundamental right of unfit defendants to be free from trial or sentencing, thus failing strict scrutiny?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-27
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2019-06-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Juan Rodriguez
Brian Edward Koch — Office the State Appellate Defender, Petitioner