WHETHER AN UNSOLICITED AND UNAPPOINTED ATTORNEY'S
FILING TRUMP.S A PRISONER'S PRO SE FILING WHEN BOTH
FILINGS RELATE TO THE SAME ISSUE BUT RELY ON DIFFERENT
LEGAL THEORIES AND DIFFERENT LEGAL POSITIONS AS TO
MATERIAL FACTS AND LAW.

WHeTHER THIS SUPREME COURT SHOULD REVERSE AND
REMAND THIS CASE IN LIGHT DE THE RAMIFICATIONS
OF FINALITY ATTACHING TO THE PRISONER'S PROCEDURAL
HISTORY WHICH WILL PREVENT THE PRISONER FROM
FILING ANY FUTURE PETITIONS UNDER 28 U.S.C.S2255.

WHETHER THIS SUPREME COURT SHOULD USE ITS
SUPERVISORY POWERS TO CORRECT THE MANIFEST
INTUSTICE PREVALENT TN THIS CASE.

WHETHER A CERTIEICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHOULA
ISSUE AS TO THE MERIT OF ThE FPD's ARGUMENTS.

Whether the lower court erred in denying petitioner's request for additional time to file a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion