No. 18-9714

John Stephen Routt v. Latanya Howard, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-procedure civil-rights conditions-of-confinement constitutional-rights disciplinary-segregation due-process eighth-amendment elder-v-holloway pretrial-detention qualified-immunity standing
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION 1
Is a Defendant entitled to qualified immunity when a Petitioner cites the "squarely governing '
case through a quote of a case with similar facts? And/or is the rule and procedure of the tenth on
qualified immunity, the same or similar to the rule that was struck down in Elder v. Holloway, 510 US
510,514-15,114 S Ct 1019,127 L Ed 2d 344 (1994).

QUESTION 2
Is a pretrial detainee entitled to due process, at some point, when placed in disciplinary
segregation for an alleged rule violation?

QUESTION 3
Does a Pretrial detainee have to meet the Eighth Amendment standard when challenging the
conditions of confinement?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is a Defendant entitled to qualified immunity when a Petitioner cites the 'squarely governing' case through a quote of a case with similar facts?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-03
Waiver of right of respondents Latanya Howard, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-06-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

John Stephen Routt
John Stephen Routt — Petitioner
Latanya Howard, et al.
Douglas Allen Wilson — Assistant District Attorney, Respondent