Was it Ineffective Assistance of Counsel by Attorney Paul Roskin failure to move to strike evidence of drug lord Maurice Rives and Shereasa McDaniels Rives false testimony at my jury trials in my claim AI in record no. 1705O5 and the Supreme Court of Virginia intrinsic fraud and perjury in falsely alleging petitioner failed to demonstrate that attorney Roskin's was deficient by affidavits, exhibits, and court transcripts of jury trials and my objections to Roskin's being effective counsel

Did Attorney Paul Roskin's violate my due process rights in his failure to move to strike testimony's of the drug lord Maurice Rives, and his organized crime network partner Shereasa Rives false testimonies, and vague in court compulsory process violation identifications to avoid federal prosecutions for the large amount of crack cocaine drug scales, illegal firearms removed from drug lord Maurice Rives and their fortified drug house in claim AA in record no. 1705O5?

Did Attorney Paul Roskin's meet the criteria of ineffective assistance of counsel by prejudice my defense in attorney petitioner since he was 3 years old?

Does this statement amount to sufficiency of evidence, and the Neil vs. Bigger 5 prong test on witness accuracy because drug lord Maurice Rives first told police on the scene of the alleged robbery and shooting that a Chinese delivery guy robbed him, and shot him, and Shereasa Rives false reported this information to officer Geist who met with drug lord Rives, and told him this false allegation, does this identification guessing and false assuming comply with the Neil Bigger vs. Bigger 5 prong identification test?

Did attorney Paul Roskins violate due-process, fail-to-strike-testimony, false-testimony, compulsory-process, ineffective-assistance-of-counsel