No. 18-9709
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion administrative-law agency-action arbitrary-and-capricious due-process judicial-review legal-accountability obstruction-of-justice standard-of-review
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
How is justice being served when the standard of review is not adhered to? When there is abuse of discretion?
The Question is: When Justices obstruct the law and legal proceedings by not adhering to the legal standards of review, who will hold them accountable? How high does the corruption go? To apply this to the law, what is justice in these United States of America? If the decision is left in the hands of the courts, then why are the courts not held accountable for incorrect legal proceedings based on arbitrary decisions that are not based on the findings of fact or law?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When Justices obstruct the law and legal proceedings by not adhering to the legal standards of review, who will hold them accountable?
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-10-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Angie Walker
Angie Walker — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent