No. 18-9682

Andre Forbes v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appeals-court civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment judicial-review motion-denial standing unconstitutional
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Whether "rubber stamping" defendant's motion with a order of
"Denied" by an Court of Appeals are unconstitutional when
Appeals Courts have not reviewed the merit(s) violates the
Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution of the Due Pro
cess doctrine ?

2) Whether defendants have a constitutional right under the
Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution of Due Pro
cess have the right to a safeguard doctrine that guarantees every
defendant's motion submitted to the Appeals Court are reviewed of
its merit(s) by an actual judge and not rubber stamped?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 'rubber stamping' defendant's motion with a order of 'Denied' by an Court of Appeals are unconstitutional when Appeals Courts have not reviewed the merit(s) violates the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution of the Due Process doctrine?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)

Attorneys

Andre Forbes
Andre Allan Forbes — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent