No. 18-9675
Tommy Dean Bullcoming v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights credibility-determination de-novo-review due-process evidence law-enforcement-testimony qualified-immunity scott-v-harris standard-of-review summary-judgment video-evidence
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
As recognized in Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), should a video recording of the actual events that clearly contradicts the sworn testimony of an officer support de novo review of the district court's credibility determination.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a video recording of the actual events that clearly contradicts the sworn testimony of an officer support de novo review of the district court's credibility determination?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Tommy Bullcoming
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent