No. 18-9665
Alejandro Hernandez-Delgado v. California
Response RequestedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence-code evidentiary-hearing fourteenth-amendment juror-bias juror-misconduct jury-deliberations racial-bias racial-stereotypes sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
What fact-finding procedures are required by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments when a defendant makes a threshold showing that a juror relied on racial stereotypes in reaching her verdict?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What fact-finding procedures are required by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments when a defendant makes a threshold showing that a juror relied on racial stereotypes in reaching her verdict?
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-31
Reply of petitioner Alejandro Hernandez-Delgado filed. (Distributed)
2019-10-11
Brief of respondent State of California in opposition filed.
2019-09-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 15, 2019.
2019-09-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 13, 2019 to October 14, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-08-14
Response Requested. (Due September 13, 2019)
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Alejandro Hernandez-Delgado
James S. Thomson — James Thomson, Attorney and Counselor at Law, Petitioner
California
Xavier Becerra — California Attorney General, Respondent
State of California
Amit Kurlekar — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent