No. 18-9631
Erickson Meko Campbell v. United States
Tags: 4th-amendment exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment good-faith-exception reasonable-suspicion rodriguez-v-united-states seizure-doctrine traffic-stop united-states-v-griffin
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
whether the exclusionary rule should apply when the only precedent the officer could rely on was not directly on point, explicitly rejected a bright-line rule pre-authorizing the seizure in favor of a totality of the circumstances analysis, and was out of step with this Court's prior and subsequent decisions governing the seizure.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the exclusionary rule should apply when the only precedent the officer could rely on was not directly on point, explicitly rejected a bright-line rule pre-authorizing the seizure in favor of a totality of the circumstances analysis, and was out of step with this Court's prior and subsequent decisions governing the seizure
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 11, 2019)
2019-04-08
Application (18A1033) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 7, 2019.
2019-04-04
Application (18A1033) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 8, 2019 to June 7, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Erickson Campbell
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent