No. 18-9595
Mike Du Trieu v. Michael Martel, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2254 appellate-review constitutional-law due-process federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-procedure procedural-bar state-court state-court-error
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a federal court reviewing a state habeas decision must determine whether the state court erred in its application of a procedural bar when the habeas petitioner asserts that the procedural bar has been applied erroneously.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court reviewing a state habeas decision must determine whether the state court erred in its application of a procedural bar when the habeas petitioner asserts that the procedural bar has been applied erroneously
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-14
Waiver of right of respondent Jared D. Lozano to respond filed.
2019-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Jared D. Lozano
Xiomara Costello — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Mike Trieu
Tracy Jan Dressner — Petitioner