Charles C. Brewington v. Oklahoma
(1)-Do thπ
AStAchKO
Okut stortk
Couht
OROARS
VTOLAK
A-DUE PROCASS
(B-AEt tO SUSPANO HAAKA -CONUS.
( A VFOLATON OF US. CONAt AA
2
WheN
Loth Cok Rrrue to Alow At
AABRAS
mpperation
HEMNY ON FOKRA
8
1
CONFUC
OR As AfKAS, Whrch
with
CONSDS, CAN thiS COUNT AOPRUSI ISELR
Or Laws or Treaties of The United States? Please see
Petitioner
Brief En Support on 1-8 Propositions? Exhibit-1
Jurisdiction to give Petitioner The proper redress
Of life and liberty without due process of Law, through
State Court proceedings? see Affidavit
Exhibit-2
Wrongful Conviction Tn cose cRF-lgal-2ao-See Pro.#7?
All F 3,4,5 are in The back of Objection To motion
To DismissrExhibit-1
7
Why would A District Court AND Appeals Court NOT
The State Legislature, The State Govenor WHEN
Thy (iKeYOWAND(ME)WERE:UNDER OATH TO?
Violations of The LAws oF The Landwe All LiveInThey
Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated by the state court proceedings