No. 18-9556

Charles R. Willard v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-06-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability inconsistent-testimony ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mental-health mental-illness prejudice prior-convictions prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing sentencing-mitigation trial-counsel witness-credibility witness-impeachment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Is the low threshold for a certificate of appealability ("COA") met on a claim that trial counsel provided prejudicially deficient performance when counsel failed to impeach the key prosecution witness with his inconsistent testimony?

2. Does a petitioner meet the low threshold for a COA on a claim that trial counsel provided prejudicially deficient performance when counsel failed to adequately emphasize petitioner's history of mental illness to support his requests that the trial court dismiss a prior "strike," so that the instant conviction would not be his "third strike"?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the low threshold for a certificate of appealability (COA) met on a claim that trial counsel provided prejudicially deficient performance when counsel failed to impeach the key prosecution witness with his inconsistent testimony?"

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 5, 2019)

Attorneys

Charles Willard
Lara Kristin HoffmanFederal Public Defender, Petitioner