Whether in light of Coolidge vs. Judge Susanno C Pineda for the State of Arizona abused discretion denying Bartett's motion to suppress Petitioner arrest and evidence unlawfully obtained in violation of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th amendment of the United States Constitution, where Pineda lacked requisite neutrality required under Coolidge to render such judgment after participating in previous Federal prosecution while Bartett was convicted of some course of conduct.

Whether in light of Bollinger v. New Hampshire, 390 U.S. 1020, the Arizona based conviction of petitioner violates his Fourth Amendment rights where the evidence was unlawfully obtained in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2511(1)(a) and the Arizona Constitution where the legislature failed to enact a statute authorizing the interception of communications