No. 18-9488

Nasedra K. Lumpkin v. Ashley Moody, Attorney General of Florida, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights default-judgment dismissal due-process equal-protection federal-court procedural-default standing
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

WHETHER REUIEW OF THE RECOND S POUIDED IN
WniT OF CENTIONALI BEFONE
SUPTENE CAURT REUEXL
On AN ABUSE
oF THE
MISCANKIGE
OF JUSTiCE
FACE OF
APPEAL
COUT'S DTSCRETiON ON THE
THE
FINAL JUOGMENT SCCH
THAT
REVEKSAL
ON COUIC COMPLAINT IS NEQUiRED?
OF
DISMiSSAE

2
WHETHER
DEFAULT
ON Civi
PROCEEOING
25
CAUSE
IF FEDENAL
B4
PETITIONEL
STATUTE
B4 SUPENE
CoUnT
28
1915
C-s.C
2S ACCURAC4
αN
FEOENAE
COUNT'S
TO PROCEED
For CUTL NEHT
ACTION?

3.WHETHER
OUE
PROCESS
CAuSE
lNpEn
COGES
CONSTITUTIONAL
LAn
REQUinE
OISMISSAL
OF
Guil
RIGT
COMPLAINST
I
FEOGAL COUNT'S
WITHOU
RERCHINLE
MENit
Felle
20
PROUIDE
Ano
FAin
2
ADUELSAK4

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fifth Amendment's due process clause requires a hearing before dismissal of a civil complaint for failure to prosecute

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-06
Waiver of right of respondents Ashley Moody, et al. to respond filed.
2019-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Ashley Moody, et al.
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Nasedra Lumpkin
Nasedra Lumpkin — Petitioner