The petitioner was injured on three occassions while performing his duties at Bensalem Youth Developement Center. (DPW). The second injury, the agency determined that Workers Compensation Insurance Service should approve Act 534 benefits. At this time light duty work was available. Why did the Insurance Service deny Act 534 and light duty?see appendix I.

Six months before I retired, my Employer and the Insurance Carrier requested that I have a Independant Medical Examination of their choice. My examination determined that I should be on Modified duty. Why did the Insurance Carrier deny this duty? see appendix G.

Workers' Compensation Appeal Board in a order, DENIED the Defendant right to appeal decision dated, 7/2 8/2010. The respondent ignored the Order and three weeks later filed this matter to Commonwealth Court of Pa, 8/17/2010. Can the defendant file an Appeal without authority?see appendix F. page8

June 21, 2011, 1 received a Memorandum Opinion from the Commonwealth Court. Stated, Petitioner Department of Public Welfare/Norritown State Hospital v. Respondent Worker's Compensation Appeal Board(Roberts) Dated 10, 2010. At no time the petitioner(Roberts) was employed at Norristown State Hospital. Should submiting a wrong litigant void this appeal? see appendix A.

S. The Factual Backround in this matter was litigated in the United States District Court February 21, 2002. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare did pay settlement in this matter in 2003. To re-litigated this matter in 2010, would this action constitute. res-judicata, collateral estoppel? After 10 years should this claim be barred due to Statue of Limitation? see appendix.0

6. The 14th Amendment limits the action of state and local officials. Equal protection under the Jaw to all citizens, which include(Due Process). I was not informed that this matter was being litigated in the Commonwealth Court until I received the suspension memorandum June 2011. This action shows continued retaliation and abuse of the respondent, with the assistance of my attorney. Should I belive in the legal principle of full, fair and transparency? Is it fair to not view the defendant's appeal or to see my attorney's response to the appeal? Is it fair that my attorney neglected to inform his client that he lost my files? Is it fair that after repeatedly asking for my files, I had to request the respondent's appeal and my attorney's response from Jenkins Law Library for $80.00? Is it fair to request my attoney to appeal the decision to suspend my benefits and he choose to file a penalty petition? see appendix K.

My Insurance Carrier's argument of, I voluntarily left the work-force when I retired. Evidence will show that my employer Barred me from enterin,g my place of employment. If the Insurance Carrier denies me the 534 Act, denies my modified duties and my employer denies me access to work, is there another choice other than retirement? see appendix J.

Is it fair that the Commonwealth Court was unaware of all above?

After pointless pages on a Appeal to the Commonwealth Court, why did the respondent claim to have offered $90.000 Authority to petitioner? see appendix.E

!O. All Questions above was concealed from the Court of the Commonwealth of Pa. Therefore all proceedings that followed never received this evidence. Would concealing consequential evidence alter a decision?

Whether the Insurance Service's denial of Act 534 benefits and light duty work for the petitioner's second injury was proper under the relevant workers' compensation laws and regulations?