No. 18-9476

In Re Anthony K. Anderson

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-05-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-violation due-process habeas-corpus judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction standing state-court state-court-proceedings
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the 8th District Court unfairly precluded pro-se litigant Anthony K. Anderson from obtaining an equal and fair ruling without implied judicial bias, and an improper application of 8th District Court's concerning convoluted and financial interest in unconstitutional "subject matter jurisdiction" can 8th District courts add facts and type back-dated facts to a civil in nature action concerning actual innocence as a result of 8th District courts unconstitutional subject matter jurisdiction?

Did 8th District Courts preclude Anthony K. Anderson from addressing the merits of his case without Supreme Court precedences, order reverse and remand of Nevada #76313 with the 8th District not having an opposition of the merits for 3 years having full knowledge that Anderson presented facts that are being precluded, equal protection courts the Senate Bill #182 Chapter 304 was with an unconstitutional Act, and all proceedings is not being this null and void?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Nevada District Court erred in denying petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus despite the court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the case

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-07-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-29
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Anthony K. Anderson
Anthony K. Anderson — Petitioner