Daniel H. Kilgore v. Ronda J. Pash, Warden, et al.
1. Is Mr. Kilgore entitled to appeal the district court's decision that Missouri did not violate Mr. Kilgore's right to due process of law when he was ordered to participate in a program that did not exist as a condition to obtaining probation?
2. Is Mr. Kilgore entitled to appeal the district court's decision that Mr. Kilgore's plea of guilty was voluntary and conformed to due process despite the fact that he was not informed of the true nature of the SOAU "program" before he entered his plea of guilty?
3. Did the court of appeals' unexplained denial of a COA as to any grounds improperly insulate its decision from review by this Court?
Is Mr. Kilgore entitled to appeal the district court's decision that Missouri did not violate Mr. Kilgore's right to due process of law when he was ordered to participate in a program that did not exist as a condition to obtaining probation?