No. 18-9461
Antonio Tillmon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conviction criminal-evidence criminal-procedure drug-distribution due-process evidence fourth-amendment fourth-circuit-review insufficient-evidence judicial-review right-to-a-fair-trial sufficiency-of-evidence undercover-agent undercover-operations
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
I.
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by concluding that there was sufficient
evidence to support Mr. Tillmon's convictions on Counts 1, 2, 48, and 49?
II.
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred by affirming the admission of scripted
video evidence suggesting Mr. Tillmon's participation in an undercover
agent's plan to obtain a gun he could use to commit murder?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in affirming Mr. Tillmon's convictions on certain counts
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Antonio Tillmon
Paul K. Sun Jr. — Ellis & Winters LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent