1. Does the "knowingly" provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2) apply to both the possession and status elements of a 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) crime ? The Court will decide that issue in Rehaif v. United States , No. 17 -9560.

2. Under the "realistic probability" standard of Gonzalez v. Duenas -Alvarez , 549 U.S. 183, 193 (2007), is it necessary to identify a reported cas e to establish that a state statute is overbroad vis-a-vis a federal definition if the plain language of the state statute so indicates ?

3. Did the Eleventh Circuit err under Miller -El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 -338 (2003) and Buck v. Davis , 137 S.Ct. 759, 773 -774 (2017) in denying Petitioner a certificate of appealability based upon adverse circuit precedent, when the question of whether Florida felony battery under Fla. Stat. § 784.041(1) is an ACCA "violent felony" is debatable among reasonable jurists ?

Does the 'knowingly' provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2) apply to both the possession and status elements of a 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) crime?