No. 18-9420
Le'Ardrus Burris v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-statute divisibility divisibility-analysis felonious-assault mathis-precedent mathis-v-united-states ohio-law ohio-revised-code-2903a sixth-circuit state-v-harris statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Sixth Circuit's divisibility analysis ignores this Court's decision in Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. __, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016) and Ohio Supreme Court precedent in State v. Harris, 911 N.E.2d 882, 886 (Ohio 2009) that definitively confirms that Ohio Revised Code § 2903(A) states only one crime and that its two subsections are merely "allied offenses of similar import".
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit's divisibility analysis ignores this Court's decision in Mathis v. United States and Ohio Supreme Court precedent in State v. Harris that definitively confirms that Ohio Revised Code § 2903(A) states only one crime and that its two subsections are merely 'allied offenses of similar import'
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2019)
2019-04-03
Application (18A1016) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until May 20, 2019.
2019-03-25
Application (18A1016) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 3, 2019 to May 20, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Le’Ardrus Burris
Craig Michael Sandberg — Muslin & Sandberg, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent