(I) INEFFELTIVE OF TLIAL COUNSE/: COUNSEL FAILEO TO SECURE AN OBSECTION TO SWABS BEING AOMITTEO IWTO EVIDENCE WHEN THE STATE DED NOT PAODUCE TANGIBLE ITEMS OF BICTURES OF ITENS THAT HWAS ALLEGEDSNABBED.

(2)INEKFECTIVE OF TRIAL COUNSEL : WAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE TO SECURE AN OBSECTIOW TO PAST CLIMINAL A EXHIBITS IN FRONT OF SHE SUT?

(S.) WMS THENE MISCONDUCT OF THE BOLICE AND SOLICITOES OFKICE MISHANDINGONA ELIDENCE

14.J NAS COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE WEN COUNSEL KAI/EO TO MAKE A SPEEOT TRZAL MOTION?

(5) OID TUIAL COUAT EaREO IN DENLINE PETITIONER TO BUASH THE INDIAMENT FOL BUGLAY FINST DEGIEE?

(6.J OID TEIAL COUT EENEO IN DENTING PETITIONEL A DILECT VELDICT WEN THE STATE DID NOT PRESENT SUEFICIENT ELIOENCE?

Was the defendant denied effective assistance of counsel?