I.Were:appellates Fourth Amend. rights violated when his backpack searched without a bona-fide warrant under the::auspice of probation searh of Raquel Perkin,butLthere was no evidence Perkins was subjected ,-to search conditions broad enough to reach a ppellants backpack in the alternative, if the issue forfeited, was trial counsel ineffective for failing to preserve the challenge for appeal?

II. May Police Constitutionally conduct a warrantless search of a non probationer's backpack,over his express claim of ownership and objection, based on a search condition of a probationer who is not present in the hotel where the search occurs, where there is no nexus between the probationer and non probationer ,save that the probationer had staved in the room with a friend!

III.Was appellate subjected to an unreasonable search within the meaning of the Forth Amendment,were Appellant was inside a dark private hotel room with a woman(Stephanie Gardner) and police enterd the room with out warning or "Knock Notice", with out confirming whohad rented the room, and with atleast one gun drawn?

Were-appellates Fourth Amend. rights violated