No. 18-9341

Antwon G. Whitten v. William A. Gunter, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eighth-amendment excessive-fines fourteenth-amendment free-speech standing takings
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether 18 M.S.C.§1732 was admissible and reliable for proof and fact of untimely filed Motion for spoliation?

Whether the admission of the Emergency Room paper effect if shows?

Whether the denial of plaintiff's Solicitors motion not being addressed by the U.S. Ct. of Apps was an abuse of discretion?

Whether plaintiff's chain of his Fed.R.Civ.P. Penal bankence evidence agreement was violated and not addressed by the U.S. Ct. of Apps was plain error?

Whether the U.S. Ct. of Apps. failure to address my Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 50 claims violated my 14th amend Due process of law rights under the uns.lonst.?

Whether plaintiff's Fraud upon the Court Claims was valid and required a response by the uss.Ct. of Apps, became an abuse of discretion when over looked?

Whether defendants proved their case based on the prior Supreme Court decisions other court of Appeals and the conflict was not addressed and proved questions of exceptional importance?

Whether the official had actual knowledge of a

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-02-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)

Attorneys

Antwon G. Whitten
Antwon G. Whitten — Petitioner