I Where a plea deal has opposing clauses, is such confusion sufficient
to reach the bar for appellate review in a §2255 process when
ineffective assistance of counsel is the claimed cause.

II Can due process exist when the gate keeper to the appellate process
in a 28 U.S.C. §2255 proceeding is the same district court that
denied the original motion.

III Would a jurist of reason consider a plea deal with a sentence in
excess of a defendant's guidelines a reasonable plea bargain.

IV If a direct appeal is acknowledged as of right after a trial and is
on occasion successful how then can the need for approval of an
appeal in a U.S.C. §2255 motion meet the standard for due process and
the fair administration of justice.

Where a plea deal has opposing clauses, is such confusion sufficient to reach the bar for appellate review in a §2255 process when ineffective-assistance-of-counsel is the claimed cause