Would it be violation of procedural & substantive due process and deprivation of right to meaningful, effective access to courts, if District Courts, Court of Appeals and or Supreme Court deprive the statutorily guaranteed right per 18 U.S.C.S. 3599(e) to representation by qualified [conflict-free] appointed counsel "throughout every subsequent stages of judicial proceedings, petition, discovery, appeals, applications for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court", including arguing for Potential, Pendent, collateral rev

Whether the Court of Appeals failed to apply the existing basis of (a) Potential, (b) Pendent, (c) 28 U.S.C.S. § 1651(a) review by Mandamus, (d) 28 USCS 1292(a)(1) jurisdiction to review injunctions, and (e) collateral review of constructive, implied denial of Motion for Substitution of capital habeas counsel