No. 18-9296
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment ada-violation civil-rights civil-rights-deprivation due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment guardianship guardianship-rights judicial-procedure jurisdiction standing
Latest Conference:
2020-02-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether ward was ever incapacitated.
Whether ward was served with paperwork when guardianship was ordered.
Whether ward was provided with opportunity to contest guardianship when filed.
Whether guardians violated their fiduciary duties.
Whether the ADA was violated.
Whether there was a lack of jurisdiction when guardianship was ordered.
Whether the continued silent witness of this court makes the attached opinions and orders of the lower courts precedential, de jure.
Whether the Petitioner's extraordinary defense of his rights, property, and innocent daughter by force of right and reason make makes any response of this Court precedential, de facto.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether ward was ever incapacitated
Docket Entries
2020-03-02
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2020-02-12
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-01-28
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-04-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 14, 2019)
Attorneys
Allen J. Dannewitz
Allen J. Dannewitz Jr. — Petitioner