No. 18-9291

Adrian Green v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment career-offender criminal-history due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plain-error plea-agreement prior-convictions sentencing sentencing-error
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was defense counsel ineffective or deficient in their representation of the defendant?

Whether the district court committed reversible plain error in the application of sentencing defendant to 170 months to run consecutive to his prior 60 month sentence?

Whether the defendant could have known the "certainty" of the consequences of the ambiguousi plea agreement in which he was lead into through defense counsel?

Whether the district court committed reversible plain error in the. ,--. application and sentencing the defendant as a career offender and enhancing his criminal history category from III to VI?

Whether the district court committed reverible plain error in use of defendant's prior convictions to enhance and to establish him as a career offender?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was defense counsel ineffective or deficient in their representation of the defendant?

Docket Entries

2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 14, 2019)

Attorneys

Adrian Green
Adrian Green — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent