No. 18-9290

Albert J. Hamilton v. Jurban, RN, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: amendment-interpretation civil-rights constitutional-conflict criminal-law disability due-process equal-protection legal-classification rational-basis sentencing standing state-interest takings
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does the State of California create a ton Flav. Under the US. Const. 5th and 14th Amend. By not Providing a Rational Relationship Between a leatti male State interest and dlascifymeg a 2pee/ Hy Megat rr) indeehions ?

2. Does the State of california dreate og Conflict under inmates defined in THe 42, Unithed States Code, Secdipas $4 /2I0L. By mot Providing 4 Radfowal Relyd— Aonship Beton 4 Leg) brute Stile fpr vst ond Classifying ~ ton! & CADAD tamale tuith Aisib/lihy, be Lveelided From fur bier pa byme Su any ~ Chee) Ged/r di es Or fetesyd any- case] He Needs ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the State of California create a conflict under the U.S. Const. 5th and 14th Amend. by not providing a rational relationship between a legitimate state interest and classifying a (CPC) illegal conviction?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2018-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 14, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Albert J. Hamilton
Albert J. Hamilton — Petitioner