No. 18-9289
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process equal-protection false-testimony habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miscarriage-of-justice prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing third-strike
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER PETITIONER IS ACTUALLY INNOCENT OF BEING ELIGIBLE FOR A THIRD-STRIKE SENTENCE UNDER 42 PA. C. S. §9714(g)?
WHETHER PETITIONER'S SENTENCING WAS THE RESULT OF FALSE, FRAUDULENT AND INACCURATE TESTIMONY BY THE PROSECUTOR AND HIS WITNESSES AT SENTENCING?
WHETHER THE FACTS PRESENTED IN PETITIONER'S HABEAS CORPUS PETITION BEFORE THIS COURT MEET THE "MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE" EXCEPTION WARRANTING RELIEF?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner is actually innocent of being eligible for a third-strike sentence under 42 PA. C. S. §9714(g)
Docket Entries
2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-28
Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to respond filed.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-04-29
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Michael Leon Haley, Sr.
Michael Leon Haley Sr. — Petitioner