Under Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. (1988) 486 U.S. 847, 100 L..Ed .2d 855, 108 S.Ct. 2194 ( A Judge(s) refusal to disqualify himself/herself for 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) violation is st extraordinary circumstance " for granting relief; And second, where there is Structural error, such as Judicial Bias, harmless error analysis is irrelevant. See Edwards v. 8a1isok, 520 U.S. 641, 647, 137 L.Ed •2d 906 9 117 S.Ct. 1584 (1997); Bracy, 286 F.3d at 414; Cartaitho v. Washington, 122 F.3d 81 9-10(7th Cir. 1997); The question presented is: When Judicial Bias at trial and on appeal leads to the Conviction and sustained incarceration of an innocent man on Death Row and the lower Courts have continuously FORCED INEFFECTIVE and DEFICIENT Counsel on petitioner, will this court provide an Avenue for Immediate relief?

Petitioner Sherman Lamont Fields is actually and factually innocent and forcing an innocent man to traverse the lower Courts for months/years awaiting this fundamental miscarriage of justice to be corrected further victimizes the innocent and violates the United States constitution. In Order to preserve the fairness, integrity and public reputation of the Justice system this Court should grant this Petition; The question presented is: Do petitioner have a Constitutional Right to be set free Immediately in light of the overwhelming evidence showing that he was framed for the crime(s) of conviction, he's Actually and factually innocent, and his first round of appeals was Unconstitutionally denied because of Judicial Bias at trial and on Appeal?

Forcing an innocent man to meet an invisible Bar in order to prove that he is actually Innocent violate the United states Constitution; Is the bar on Actual innocence Unconstitutionally High?

Do petitioner have a Constitutional Right to be set free Immediately in light of the overwhelming evidence showing that he was framed for the crime(s) of conviction, he's Actually and factually innocent, and his first round of appeals was Unconstitutionally denied because of Judicial Bias at trial and on Appeal?