No. 18-9279
Regina M. Preetorius v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights counsel-performance criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-bargaining right-to-counsel sixth-amendment standing strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Honorable Appellate Court err when it determined that trial counsel's
failure to advise his client that she should accept the government's plea offer
did not constitute inadequate representation of counsel under Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668, 690, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2066 (1984)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in dismissing petitioner's claims for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-05-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2019)
Attorneys
Regina M. Preetorius
Regina M. Preetorius — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent