No. 18-9271

Eteri Kholost, et al. v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: consumer-reporting-agency due-process fair-credit-reporting-act federal-trade-commission interstate-litigation national-security reseller standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Must Real Page, Inc., in interests of national security define itself as a Consumer Reporting Agency (CRA) and be responsible in that number under Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) if the 15USC §1681 a(f), 1681 a(p), 1681a (u) RESELLER and the different trials have already defined it as a CRA?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Must Real Page, Inc. in interests of national security define itself as a Consumer Reporting Agency (CRA) and be responsible in that number under Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) if the 15USC §§1681a(f), 1681a(p), 1681a(u) RESELLER and the different trials have already defined it as a CRA?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al. to respond filed.
2019-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2019)

Attorneys

Department of Housing and Urban Development, et al.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Eteri Kholost, et al.
Eteri Kholost — Petitioner