1. Whether the government's expert's afterthe-fact opinion of the applicable standard of care of Florida Pharmacists is an ex post facto interpretation of the criminal standard of conduct resulting in an unconstitutional conviction based on an ex post facto law.

2. Whether the government's expert's afterthe-fact opinion rendered the standard of criminal conduct unconstitutionally vague.

3. Whether in this § 2255 Motion Petitioner is barred by the doctrine of procedural default for failure to raise these issues on direct appeal.

Whether the government's expert's after-the-fact opinion of the applicable standard of care of Florida Pharmacists is an ex post facto interpretation of the criminal standard of conduct resulting in an unconstitutional conviction based on an ex post facto law