No. 18-9256
Zeeshan Khalid Syed v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affidavit certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure civil-rights counsel-affidavit court-discretion due-process evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se reasonableness-of-counsel standing waiver waiver-doctrine writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2019-06-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
Q1. When a pro-se files for a COA and discuss his claim extensively in his argument, can the Court construe the issue as being waived?
Q2. When the Court evaluating the reasonableness of the counsel, can they rely completely on a counsel's affidavit with out considering other reference of evidence that Movant provides without calling for an evidential hearing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a pro-se files for a COA and discusses his claim extensively in his argument, can the Court construe the issue as being waived?
Docket Entries
2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 14, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Zeeshan Khalid Syed
Zeeshan Syed — Petitioner