1. QUESTION: Does the Doctrine of 'Equitable Tolling' due to claims of 'FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT' of obviously important facts, extend to AEDPA legislative cases, if the lower court lilkewise, cited and sought guidance In other NON-AEDPA Legislative cases-?

2.. QUESTION: Does Suits in Admirality Act (SAA) Legislation extended, by the Fifth Circuit into AEDPA case law, used as guidance to the question of 'EQUITABLE TOLLING', justttfy Atkins attempt to extend FTCA Legislation as 'MATERIALLY INDISTINGUISH ABLE'-?

QUESTION: Does SAA LegislatUon regarding 'DISCOVERY RULE' extend to Atkins. case on a set of MATERIALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE fact-?

QUESTION: Should the argument for RARE and EXCEPTIONAL cUrc.urnstances claimed in BUCK V. DAVIS, 137 S.Ct. 759 (2017), extend to the INSTANT CASE on a 'set of MATERIALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE FACTS.

QUESTION: Was trial counsel's decflsion not to investflgate claims of non-transmission; impoch detcc.t!!vc durUng suppression hearing; cross examine and impeach in jury's presence REASONABLE professional standards, resultflng in prejudice.

Does the Doctrine of 'Equitable Tolling' due to claims of 'Fraudulent Concealment' of obviously important facts, extend to AEDPA legislative cases?