No. 18-9208
Robert Tringham v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights core-judicial-functions court-of-appeals due-process habeas judicial-delegation judicial-functions non-judicial-officer procedural-authority remand rule-12.1' 'Does the Court hold that pursuant to rule-22b2 rule-60b6 rule-60b6' 'Does FRAP 12.1 grant a Circuit Court standing
Latest Conference:
2019-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question 1.
Under what circumstances does access to the courts not mean access
to justice.
Question 2.
Does FRAP 12.1 grant a Circuit Court of Appeals the authority to
delegate its core judicial functions to a non judicial officer.
Question 3.
Does the Court hold that pursuant to Rule 22(b)(2), a notice of
appeal can only be construed as an application for a COA, in a
habeas context, not in Rule 60(b)(6), where the only issue is
whether the district court complied with the Court of Appeals
order of remand.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Under what circumstances does access to the courts not mean access to justice
Docket Entries
2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-04-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2019)
Attorneys
Robert Tringham
Robert Tringham — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent