DID THE TRIAL COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING MR. PEREZ RELIEF
FROM JUDGMENT WHERE HE WAS DENIED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO
AN IMPARTIAL JURY BASED ON A POLICE OFFICER'S ENUMERATION OF PAST
CRIMES TO THE JURY BEFORE THE JURY WAS EVEN EMPANELED AND WAS
COUNSEL INEFFECTIVE FOR NOT CONDUCTING A NECESSARY FOLLOW UP?

DID THE TRIAL COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT WHERE MR. PEREZ ALLEGED A DUE PROCESS VIOLATION BASED
ON THE PROSECUTION'S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DISCOVERY OF
THE NAMES OF WITNESSES THAT WOULD HAVE PROVIDED HIM WITH A
VIABLE DEFENSE, AND WHERE THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO DECLARE A
MISTRIAL FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED BRADY VIOLATION?

IS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO A CROSBY HEARING OR RESENTENCING UNDER
PEOPLE V LOCKRIDGE, WHERE HIS SENTENCE IS BASED IN PART UPON AN
UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND IS VOID BASED UPON THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT OPINION IN MONTGOMERY V LOUISIANA WHICH HELD THAT
A CONVICTION OR SENTENCE BASED UPON AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS
VOID AB INITO?

Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying relief from judgment based on a violation of the right to an impartial jury and ineffective assistance of counsel?