No. 18-9191

Jerome Allen Bargo v. Raymond Naylor, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: contradictory-evidence cruel-punishment cvsa cvsa-test disciplinary-action due-process eighth-amendment inmate-rights prison-conditions prison-discipline unsupported-evidence
Latest Conference: 2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Did the Eighth Circuit err in holding that Bargo's CVSA tests results constituted "some evidence" to support disciplinary action, even though the results were contradictory on its face and unsupported by any other evidence?

Did the Eighth Circuit err in holding that the work-conditions failed to violate the Eighth Amendment because Bargo was not harmed and there was no precedent specifically "requiring prison officials to provide outdoor toilets, hand sanitizers, or gloves"?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Eighth Circuit err in holding that Bargo's CVSA tests results constituted 'some evidence' to support disciplinary action, even though the results were contradictory on its face and unsupported by any other evidence?

Docket Entries

2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-05
Waiver of right of respondents Raymond Naylor, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2019)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Jerome A. Bargo
Jerome Allen Bargo — Petitioner
Raymond Naylor, et al.
Michael Anthony Cantrell — Office of the Arkansas Attorney General, Respondent