WHETHER REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED BECAUSE STATE COURT'S SUMMARY DENIAL OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, SEEKING BELATED DIRECT APPEAL OR REINSTATEMENT OF DISMISSED APPEAL, WITHOUT REQUIRING RESPONSE IS ERRONEOUS IN LIGHT OF RECORD EVIDENCE AND FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS OF UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT AND DEPRIVATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS RIGHTS BY STATE-INVOLVED ACTION WHEN COURT-APPOINTED APPELLATE COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER ARBITRARILY FAILED TO PROSECUTE APPEAL?

Whether review should be granted because state court's summary denial of petition for writ of habeas corpus, seeking belated direct appeal or reinstatement of dismissed appeal, without requiring response is erroneous in light of record-evidence and factual allegations of unlawful imprisonment and deprivation of equal-protection, due-process