No. 18-9188
Eric Thorton Von Hall v. Brad Cain, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court appellate-procedure article-iii article-three constitutional-interpretation due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion mistake-of-law party-presentation party-presentation-principle
Latest Conference:
2019-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Article III of the Constitution and the party presentation principle foreclose appellate court judges from relying on an argument not presented in the adversarial context that results in a mistake of law upon which the court relied to deny habeas corpus relief.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Article III of the Constitution and the party presentation principle foreclose appellate court judges from relying on an argument not presented in the adversarial context that results in a mistake of law upon which the court relied to deny habeas corpus relief
Docket Entries
2019-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2019.
2019-05-15
Waiver of right of respondent Mark Nooth to respond filed.
2019-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Eric Von Hall
Mark Nooth
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent