Michael S. Bent v. Pamela Talkin, Marshal, Supreme Court of the United States, et al.
Does the Chief of Police via his Police Booth Operation violate Bent's right to be secure in his papers and his right to Due Process by seizing, without probable cause shown, papers intended for this Court?
Does the District Court abuse its discretion to deny use of that court's Electronic Case Filing system without any reason whatsoever or otherwise to test Bent's ability to overcome that court's obstacles?
Does Bent have supplemental standing under Flast given Congress has exceeded it constitutional authority to establish a Chief of Police for this Court who is not under the full supervisory authority of this Court?
Does the Chief of Police's Police Booth Operation violate the right to be secure in papers and due process?