No. 18-9167
Michael J. Pendleton v. Melissa Hainsworth, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Somerset
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment amendment-violation constitutional-rights contract-clause conviction-resentencing criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process ex-post-facto non-existent-crime state-federal-government state-legislation state-legislature substantive-due-process
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Securities Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Violate Peritioner's Substantive Due $43 when it Convicted and Resentenced Htim For a Non-Existent Codified or Backed By state Legislatuves Thus Violating the 14th Amendment And Contract Betmeen State And Faderal Government?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania violated the petitioner's substantive due process rights by convicting and resentencing him for a non-existent crime not codified or backed by state legislatures, thus violating the 14th Amendment and the contract between state and federal government
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2018-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Michael J. Pendleton
Michael J. Pendleton — Petitioner